NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jazabas v Haddad [2008] NSWSC 593
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 & 27 May 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 June 2008
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison AsJ
DECISION : (1) The plaintiffs' notice of motion filed 7 January 2008 is dimissed. (2) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : LIFT STAY OF PROCEEDINGS - Security for costs
Corporations Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Fair Trading Act 1987 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 3 FCR 1 Buckley v Bennell Design & Constructions Pty Limited (1974) 1 ACLR 301 Epping Plaza Fresh Fruit & Vegetables Pty Ltd v Bevendale Pty Ltd [1999] 2 VR 191 Gentry Bros Pty Ltd v Wilson Brown & Associate POty Ltd (1992) 8 ACSR 405; 10 ACLC 1394 CASES CITED : Jazabas v Botany Council [2000] NSWSC 58 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad [2007] NSWCA 91 K P Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189 Latoudis v Casey (199) 170 CLR 534 Maritime Association Inc (Court of Appeal, 23 December 1992, unreported) Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72
TEXTS CITED : G E Dal Pont, Law of Costs (2003) LexisNexis Butterworths
Jazabas Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) BAS Developments Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) PARTIES : Permtree Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Sam Haddad (First Defendant) State of New South Wales (Second Defendant) City of Botany Bay Council (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate