NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Wright v R [2008] NSWCCA 282
HEARING DATE(S): 21/11/08
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 December 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; Kirby J at 2; Hall J at 36
DECISION: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Practice & Procedure - maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm - use of glass/bottle as weapon - history of similar offences - finding of continuing disregard of the law - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465 R v Steeden (NSW CCA, unreported, 19/8/1994) R v Woodhouse (NSW CCA, unreported 20/12/1996) CASES CITED : R v McAdam (NSW CCA, unreported, 29/9/1997) R v Rowe (NSW CCA, unreported, 10/12/1997) R v Mackey [2006] NSWCCA 254 Morris v R [2007] NSWCCA 127 R v Trevenna [2004] NSWCCA 43; (2004) 149 A Crim R 505
PARTIES: Damien John Wright (App) Regina (Resp)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/15235
COUNSEL: C Smith (Appl) N Noman (Resp/Crown)
SOLICITORS: S O'Connor (LAC - Appl) S Kavanagh (Resp/Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2007/11/0558
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Solomon DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 8/2/08
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2007/15235
TOBIAS JA KIRBY J HALL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate