NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd v Jessel [2007] NSWSC 1351
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison J
DECISION : (1) Summons dismissed. (2) Plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Motor Accidents Assessment Service – assessment of degree of permanent impairment by medical assessor – assessor's determination made subject to qualification concerning relevant expertise – application by claimant for review of determination – no decision to review - referral instead by proper officer to another assessor – further determination made by relevantly qualified medical assessor – increase in degree of whole person impairment following further assessment - application by plaintiff for further determination to be set aside - whether original determination conclusive and/or made within jurisdiction – whether referral by proper officer to another assessor in the circumstances an appropriate exercise of statutory power
LEGISLATION CITED : Interpretation Act 1987 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Crazzi [2006] NSWSC 1090 CASES CITED : Kabourakis v The Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2006] VSCA 301 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; (2002) 209 CLR 597
Australian Associated Motor Insurers Limited (Plaintiff) Angus Mackay Jessel (First Defendant) PARTIES : Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Isabella Watkins (Third Defendant) Raymond Carroll (Fourth Defendant) Steven Davison (Fifth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate