NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Steven Faraday v Thomas Gabor Rappaport & 2 Ors;Steven Faraday v Thomas Gabor Rappaport ;Rosalia Rappaport by her tutor Thomas Gabor Rappaport v Steven Faraday [2007] NSWSC 34
HEARING DATE(S) : 7-11/08/06, 14-17/08/06, 21/02/07 and written submissions.
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : See paragraphs 291-294 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS – Plaintiff in proceedings no. 2649/02 claimed beneficial interest in properties in New South Wales and Queensland held by third defendant on trust for first and second defendants – Where plaintiff paid moneys to first defendant for purposes of property investment but did not reach agreement with defendant that plaintiff should have any defined beneficial interest in properties – Where no compliance with ss 23C or 54A Conveyancing Act 1991 (NSW) or ss 11 or 59 Property Law Act 1974 (Qld) – Where no evidence of acts of part performance – Khoury v Khouri [2006] NSWCA 184 applied – Held that plaintiff not entitled to beneficial interest in properties - CONTRACTS – Agreements not intended to create legal relations – Domestic, social and other agreements – Plaintiff in proceedings no. 3668/03 claimed that defendant agreed to leave property to plaintiff upon defendant's death in exchange for moneys contributing towards purchase price of property – Whether plaintiff and defendant intended to create legal relations – Held that plaintiff contributed moneys to defendant as gift - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – Plaintiff in proceedings no. 3668/03 claimed that defendant failed upon demand to return moneys and goods given to defendant for safekeeping – Plaintiff's claim in detinue – Plaintiff's claim statute-barred by virtue of ss 14 and 21 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) – No questions of principle.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate