NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina (C'Wealth) v Baladjam & Ors [No 48] [2008] NSWSC 1467
HEARING DATE(S) : 07/08/08; 18/08/08; 02/09/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 September 2008
JURISDICTION : Criminal
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : Order that the Notice of Motion dated 4 July 2008 be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Application to exclude admissions made by accused on the basis of oppressive police conduct - Proper construction of s 84 Evidence Act 2005. - CRIMINAL LAW - Application to exclude from trial items removed during execution of a search warrant - Suggested breaches of ss 3K(3)(a) and (b) of Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - Failure to notify the occupier of the premises from which items have been removed of the place and time at which the subsequent examination will be carried out - Failure to allow the occupier or his representative to be present during the subsequent examination - Proper construction of section. - CRIMINAL LAW - Breaches of ss 3K(3B) and (3C) - Failure to make application for extension of time in the name of the executing officer - Failure by executing officer to give notice of the extension application to the occupier - Failure to give adequate notice to occupier's solicitor - Proper construction of ss 3K(3B) and (3C) of Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). - CRIMINAL LAW - Alleged failure to give a copy of search warrant to a person in the position of alternate occupier - The requirements of s 3H of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - Proper construction of section. - CRIMINAL LAW - Alleged breach of 3P of Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - Failure to allow occupier or alternate occupier to be present during the search - Proper construction of section in circumstances where occupier has been arrested, detained and taken away from the premises. - CRIMINAL LAW - Proper construction of s 23G of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - Failure to allow an arrested person to communicate with friend, relative and legal practitioner - Whether alleged failure capable of amounting to oppressive conduct - Whether any breaches of the accused's rights under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) had any bearing on his making the statement sought to be excluded. - CRIMINAL LAW - Applicability of ss 135 and 137 and 90 of Evidence Act 1995 - Whether statements should be excluded as being unfairly prejudicial or unfair to the accused. - CRIMINAL LAW - S 138 Evidence Act 1995 - Ambit of discretionary considerations and matters relevant to decision as to whether evidence should be excluded where breach has been established.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate