NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 76 NSWLR 533
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: B v R [2008] NSWCCA 85
HEARING DATE(S): 10/4/08
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; James J at 109; Howie J at 110
DECISION: 1 Stand over Order 3 sought in the Notices of Application for Leave to Appeal of Khaled Cheikho dated 3 April 2008, of Mirsad Mulahalilovic dated 4 April 2008 and of Mazen Touma dated 7 April 2008. 2 Otherwise refuse leave to appeal on each Application.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Indictments – Conspiracy – Patent duplicity – Latent duplicity – Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 11.5 - CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Indictments – Consent to commence proceedings – Time of commencement of proceedings – Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 11.5(8) - CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Indictments – Conspiracy – Whether a conspiracy to commit a preparatory act is unknown to law – Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 101.6.
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Ansari v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 204; (2007) 173 A Crim R 112 Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers [1891] AC 107 Blue Metal Industries Ltd v Dilley (1969) 117 CLR 651 Commissioner of Taxation v Cocaj [2004] QCA 69; [2004] 2 Qd R 488 Coward v Allan (1984) 52 ALR 320 CSR Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [2000] NSWCCA 373; (2000) 110 LGERA 334 Director of Public Prosecutions v Merriman [1973] AC 584 Director of Public Prosecutions v Stark [2006] VSCA 61 Gerakiteys v The Queen (1984) 153 CLR 317 Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467 Lodhi v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 121; (2006) 199 FLR 303 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 193 CLR 355 R v ARD [2000] NSWCCA 443 R v Armstrong [1996] 1 Qd R 316 R v Barlow [1997] HCA 18; (1997) 188 CLR 1 R v Butler (1991) 24 NSWLR 66 R v Carusi (1989) 17 NSWLR 516 R v CDR (No 2) [1996] 1 Qd R 69 R v Challita (1988) 37 A Crim R 175 R v Chow (1987) 11 NSWLR 561 R v Deng (1996) 91 A Crim R 80 R v Evans [1964] VR 717 R v F (1996) 90 A Crim R 356 CASES CITED : R v Ferguson (No 11) [2005] VSC 527; (2005) 165 A Crim R 337 R v Giam [1999] NSWCCA 53; (1999) 104 A Crim R 416 R v Hamzy (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 281; (2005) 64 NSWLR 10 R v Lao and Nguyen [2002] VSCA 157; (2002) 5 VR 129 R v Lodhi [2005] NSWSC 1377; (2005) 199 FLR 236 R v Mitchell [1971] VR 46 R v Moore [1988] 1 Qd R 252 R v Moussad [1999] NSWCCA 337; (1999) 152 FLR 373 R v Ongley (1940) 57 WN (NSW) 116 R v Orban [2005] NSWCCA 312 R v Poulier [2007] NTCCA 4; (2007) 19 NTLR 91 R v Ruddell [2006] 1 Qd R 361 R v Taylor [2003] NSWCCA 194 R v Wyles; Ex parte Attorney-General [1977] Qd R 169 R v Zampogna [2003] SASC 75; (2003) 85 SASR 56 Romeyko v Samuels (1972) 2 SASR 529; (1972) 19 FLR 322 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Salmon v Chute (1994) 115 FLR 176 Stanton v Abernathy (1990) 19 NSWLR 656 Stuart v The Queen (1974) 134 CLR 426 Sungravure Pty Ltd v Middle East Airlines Airliban SAL (1975) 134 CLR 1 Trudgeon v R (1988) 39 A Crim R 252 Vallance v The Queen (1961) 108 CLR 56 Walsh v Tattersall [1996] HCA 26; (1996) 188 CLR 77
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate