NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Minister for Planning v Walker (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 334
HEARING DATE(S): written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 December 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Campbell JA at 11; Bell JA at 12
DECISION: Each party pay its own costs at first instance and on appeal.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE – Costs – Public interest litigation – Need for additional factors if successful defendant to be denied costs – Whether costs should be ordered in this case.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 5
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Minister For Planning v Jill Walker [2008] NSWCA 224 CASES CITED: Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v Sutherland Shire Council (No 2) [2004] NSWLEC 434; (2004) 136 LGERA 365 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72
MINISTER FOR PLANNING (Appellant) PARTIES: Jill WALKER (First Respondent) STOCKLAND DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD (ABN 71 000 064 835) (Second Respondent) ANGLICAN RETIREMENT VILLAGES – DIOCESE OF SYDNEY (ABN 39 922 848 563) (Third Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40893/07
S DUGGAN (Appellant) COUNSEL: Kirsty RUDDOCK (Sol.) (First Respondent) Second Respondent (submitting appearance) Third Respondent (submitting appearance)
Christine Hanson, Legal Services Branch, Department of Planning (Appellant) SOLICITORS: Environmental Defenders' Office Ltd (First Respondent) Herbert Geer & Rundle (Second Respondent) John Frederick Whitehouse, Minter Ellison Lawyers (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate