NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Singline v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 21
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 August 2007, 17 October 2007, 8 November 2007, 13 December 2007, 20 December 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 January 2008
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J
1. Orders (3) and (4) of the judgment issued in this matter on 27 August 2007 be set aside and in lieu thereof the following orders be made: "(3) The defendant shall pay damages to the plaintiff in the sum of $714,211, including interest; (4) The defendant shall pay the costs of the plaintiff of and incidental to these proceedings on the following bases: DECISION : (a) Up to and including 2 March 2006 on a party/party basis, as agreed or assessed; (b) On and from 3 March 2006 on an indemnity basis; (c) Such costs to include the cost of attendance by medical practitioners qualified by the plaintiff at examinations required by the defendant in circumstances where said medical practitioner was required to travel from Melbourne to Launceston for the purpose of such attendance." 2. The parties continue to have liberty to apply on the basis of any perceived miscalculation subsequent to the judgment of 27 August 2007 or otherwise in relation to any collateral issue.
CATCHWORDS : DAMAGES – reduction for uncertainty – Malec v Hutton – damages in the past for probable course – mistake in the calculation of interest - COSTS – indemnity costs awarded – Offer of Compromise – costs of medical expert qualified by plaintiff attending interstate an examination by the defendant's experts.
Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate