NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Exhibition Marketing Pty Limited ACN 010 519 329 v Richmond Valley Council [2008] NSWSC 1253
HEARING DATE(S) : 6 and 7 November 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 November 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Ward J at 1
DECISION : Declaration made for the Plaintiff.
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING – Contract for sale of land – Whether contract validly terminated – Whether implied or express obligation on part of Purchaser to construct drainage works – Whether Vendor could terminate for failure to register easement within time specified - Whether repudiation of contract – HELD: No express or implied obligation to construct drainage works – Vendor unable to terminate for failure to register easement without first allowing a further reasonable time –Vendor under express or implied obligation to cooperate in relation to satisfaction of condition subsequent - No repudiation – Purported termination ineffective. - EQUITY – Relief – Whether appropriate to order specific performance in the circumstances - Whether declaratory relief of utility – HELD: Not appropriate to order specific performance – Declaratory relief of utility – Declaration made.
Civil Procedure Act 2005 Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Government Act 1919 Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Aberfoyle Plantations Limited v Khan Bian Cheng [1960] AC 115 Barclay v Messenger (1874) 30 LT 351 Butts v O'Dwyer (1952) 87 CLR 267 Carr v J A Berriman (1953) 89 CLR 327 Chopard v Vamiso (1998) 9 BPR 16,813 Codelfa Constructions Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Electronic Industries Limited v David Jones Limited (1954) 91 CLR 288 Franklins Pty Limited v Metcash Trading Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 446 Gilbert v Healey Investment Pty Limited [1975] 1 NSWLR 650 Honner v Ashton (1979) 1 BPR 9478 Integrated Lighting & Ceilings Pty Limited v Philips Electrical Pty Limited (1969) 90 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 693 Kilmer v British Columbia Orchard Lands Limited [1913] AC 319 Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Limited [2007] 233 CLR 115 Lohar Corp Pty Limited v Dibu Pty Limited (1976) 1 BPR 9177 CASES CITED : Magill v National Australia Bank Limited [2001] NSWCA 221 Neeta (Epping) Pty Limited v Phillips (1974) 131 CLR 286 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Limited (1976) 136 CLR 444 One Spencer Pty Limited v Maryland International Pty Limited (2005) 12 BPR 23,113 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Limited v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1 Posner v Scott-Lewis [1987] Ch 25 Shepherd v Felt and Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 Shiloh Spenders v Harding [1973] AC 691 Sportsvision Australia Pty Limited v Tallglen (1998) 44 NSWLR 103 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Limited (1950) 81 CLR 418 The Millstream Pty Limited v Shultz [1980] 1 NSWLR 547 Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 16 Trans Realties Pty Limited v Grbac [1975] 1 NSWLR 170 Tropical Traders Limited v Goonan (1963-1964) 111 CLR 41 Waterways Authority of NSW v Coal & Allied Operations Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 183
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate