NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 185 A Crim R 360
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: BJR v R [2008] NSWCCA 43
HEARING DATE(S): 16 October 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 June 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hulme J at 36; Latham J at 47
DECISION: 1. Appellant's appeal against conviction on Counts 1 and 3 is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CONVICTION APPEAL - maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily harm - circumstantial case against father of two infants - co-incidence evidence whether open to jury to draw inference of specific intent.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
De Gruchy v The Queen [2002] HCA 33 ; (2002) 211 CLR 85 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53 ; (2002) 213 CLR 606 R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13 R v Micallef (2002) 136 A Crim R 127 R v Kaldor (2004) 150 A Crim R 271 ; Chahine v R [2006] NSWCCA 179 Knight v R [1992] HCA 56; (1992) 175 CLR 495 Martin v Osborne [1936] HCA 23; (1936) 55 CLR 367 Plomp v R [1963] HCA 44; (1963) 110 CLR 234 CASES CITED : Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 R v Barreto (unreported, CCA, 29 September 1993) Barca v R [1975] HCA 42; (1975) 133 CLR 82 Shepherd v R [1990] HCA 56; (1990) 170 CLR 573 Parker v R [1963] HCA 14; (1963) 111 CLR 610 Cutter v R [1997] HCA 7; (1997) 143 ALR 498 R v Micallef (2002) 136 A Crim R 127 R v Kaldor (2004) 150 A Crim R 271 Chahine v R [2006] NSWCCA 179 R v Barreto NSWCCA (unreported) 29 September 1993 R v Pearson (2002) 137 A Crim R 419 ; [2002] NSWCCA 429
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate