NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Miletic v R [2008] NSWCCA 74
HEARING DATE(S): 28/03/2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; James J at 2; Hoeben J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Appeal against sentence - ongoing supply of small quantites of prohibited drugs - principles of cumulation and totality - parity in sentencing - whether basis for justifiable sense of grievance.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Johnson v R (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 at [50] to [52] R v Brown [1999] NSWCCA 323 R v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 at [30] R v Gorman (2002) 137 A Crim R 326 CASES CITED : R v Hammoud (2002) 118 A Crim R 66 at [7] R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 at 260 R v Janceski (No 2) [2005] NSWCCA 288 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 at 249 R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272 at [11] R v Myers [2002] NSWCCA 162 at [34] R v Percy [1975] Tas SR 62 at 73 R v T (NSWCCA, 19 June 1995). R v Wegener [1999] NSWCCA 405 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 at [34] – [37] R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 at [26] - [28]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate