NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 61 ACSR 246
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 69
HEARING DATE(S) : 08/02/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 February 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Applications by prospective examinees for leave to be heard without becoming parties dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - special purpose liquidator appointed to consider whether viable causes of action arose from particular events - application by special purpose liquidator for issue of examination summonses - application by prospective examinees for leave to be heard on hearing of liquidator's application - whether liquidator's ability to pursue potential proceedings despite time bars may be preserved by agreements not to rely on such bars - particular bar created by s.588FF(3) of Corporations Act - where extended period fixed within three year period - whether court may order further extension
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, s.19 Civil Procedure Act 2005, s.3(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 5.9, ss.1337B(2), 588FB(1), 588FF(1), 588FF(3), 596A, 596B, 596C(1), 596C(2), LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987, ss.42, 68(2) Limitation Act 1969, s.68A Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999, rules 2.13(1), 11.3(1), 11.4, 11.5(2) Trade Practices Act, s.82(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, s.36.16(3)
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Ltd (2004) 52 ACSR 103 BP Australia Ltd v Brown (2003) 58 NSWLR 322 Davies v Chicago Boot Co Ltd (2006) 58 ACSR 505 Gordon v Tolcher (2006) 231 ALR 582 Kalls Enterprises Pty Ltd v Baloglow [2006] NSWSC 617 McGrath v HIH Insurance Ltd (2004) 205 ALR 643 Murdoch v Weston (2004) 49 ACSR 166 New Cap Reinsurance v Reaseguros Alianza SA [2004] NSWSC 787 CASES CITED : Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd (2003) 48 ACSR 562 Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd (2006) 57 ACSR 279 Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd (2006) 58 ACSR 466 Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1434 Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1447 Re Freshkept Technology Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 500 Re Shepherds Producers Co-operative Ltd (2006) 65 NSWLR 381 Rodgers v Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 88 FCR 61 Western Australia v Wardley Australia Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 245
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate