NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rundle v Salvation Army (South Australia Property Trust) & Anor [2007] NSWSC 443
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 October 2006; 31 October 2006; 1 November 2006; 2 November 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 May 2007
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J
DECISION : (1) Pursuant to s48 of the Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) the time for commencement of proceedings against the first defendant is extended to 25 March 2003; (2) The first defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application.
CATCHWORDS : LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – tort – personal injury – psychological/psychiatric injury arising from sexual abuse of plaintiff as a child in care of first defendant between 1960 and 1965 – plaintiff under disability until April 1971 – action statute barred – application for extension of time – application governed by SA legislation – amendments to legislation – whether amendments apply to proceedings already commenced – whether plaintiff had an accrued right – correct identification of right said to have accrued – whether material fact(s) not ascertained by plaintiff until within twelve months of institution of proceedings – whether any conduct of first defendant available to excuse plaintiff's failure to institute proceedings within limitation period – what constitutes material fact – when plaintiff aware of material facts – whether it is just to grant extension of time – estoppel – whether failure of first defendant to particularise opposition to application relevant to justice of granting extension – Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) s 48
LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Ipp Recommendations) Act 2004 Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA)
Boral Windows v Industry Research & Development Board [1998] FCA 455; 83 FCR 215 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; 186 CLR 541 Ellis v Pell [2006] NSWSC 109 John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson [2000] HCA 36; 203 CLR 503 Laurie v Renad [1892] 3 Ch 402 Longman v The Queen [1989] HCA 60; 168 CLR 79 CASES CITED : Maxwell v Murphy [1957] HCA 7; 96 CLR 261 Nowlan v Marson Transport Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 346; 53 NSWLR 116 Re Rutledge [1973] VR 733 Reid v Reid (1886) 31 Ch D 402 Sola Optical Australia Pty Ltd v Mills [1987] HCA 57; 163 CLR 628 The Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; 170 CLR 394 Wright v Donatelli (1995) 65 SASR 307
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate