NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) 25 ACLC 1,141
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Litmus Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v Paul Brian Canty & Ors [2007] NSWSC 670
HEARING DATE(S) : 07/06/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 June 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : White J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 8 June 2007
DECISION : See paragraphs 56-57 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Costs – Security for costs – Discretionary considerations – Delay – Bona fides and strength of claim – Stultification of litigation – Cause of plaintiff's impecuniosity – Security ordered - Quantum. - CORPORATIONS – Standing – Strike-out of parts of pleadings in which plaintiff sought declarations of contravention under s 1317E of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Lack of standing in plaintiff, under s 1317J, to make application. - (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, ss 1317E, 1317J, 1335 - (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.21(1)(d)
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Litmus Australia Pty Limited v Canty & Ors [2006] NSWSC 196; (2006) 57 ACSR 71 Canty v The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2005) 63 NSWLR 152 Rhema Ventures Pty Ltd v Stenders [1993] 2 Qd R 326 CASES CITED : Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance [2002] NSWSC 1162 Fiduciary Limited v Morningstar Research Pty Limited (2004) 208 ALR 564 Bell Wholesale Co Limited v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 BPN Pty Ltd v HPM Pty Ltd (1996) 131 FLR 339 Brundza v Robbie & Co (1952) CLR 174
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate