NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251
HEARING DATE(S) : On written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 March 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
DECISION : Application under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 refused.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - applicant convicted at trial of sexual assault offences - application under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - claim of doubt or question as to applicant's guilt - nature of application - relevance of fresh evidence rule - reasons for decision on application - whether doubt or question as to applicant's guilt or doubt or question as to part of evidence in the case - application refused
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Listening Devices Act 1984 Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Procedure Act 1986
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Kirk Group Holdings Pty Limited v WorkCover Authority of NSW (2006) 66 NSWLR 151 Varley v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) [2003] 214 CLR 318 R v Ion (1996) 89 A Crim R 81 R v Johns (2000) 110 A Crim R 149 R v Pollock [2005] NSWCCA 316 Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1985-1986) 159 CLR 656 Commissioner of Police v Ryan [2007] NSWCA 196 R v Vastag (Court of Criminal Appeal, 20 June 1997, unreported) R v Holland [2002] NSWCCA 469 The Queen v Swaffield; Pavic v The Queen [1998] 192 CLR 159 R v NZ (2005) 63 NSWLR 628 CASES CITED : TKWJ v The Queen [2002] 212 CLR 124 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Ex parte NSW Police Service; re Listening Devices Act 1984 (2003) 140 A Crim R 415 Application of Rendell (1987) 32 A Crim R 243 Application of Pedrana (2000) 117 A Crim R 45 Application of Suey [2001] NSWSC 543 Application of Moore (2000) 112 A Crim R 331 Application of Esposito (Hunt J, 14 July 1988, unreported) Application of Visser (Newman J, 27 June 1994, BC9402667) Application of Dunn [2005] NSWSC 857 Application of Milat (2005) 157 A Crim R 565 Application of Higgins [2007] NSWSC 848 Application of Kalajzich (Grove J, 18 September 1992, BC9201597)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate