NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina (C'Wealth) v Baladjam & Ors [No 49] [2008] NSWSC 1468
HEARING DATE(S) : 07/08/08; 18/08/08; 02/09/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 September 2008
JURISDICTION : Criminal
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : Order that the applications for Separate Trials be refused.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Applications for separate trial - Principles applicable to application - Circumstances where one accused has evidence admitted against him which is not admissible against the others.
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 3 H, 3K, 3P, 23D, 23F and 23 G Evidence Act 1995 ss 84, 90, 135, 137 and 138
Dominican v R (1989) 43 A Crim R 24 at 26 Webb v R (1994) 181 CLR 41 at 88-89 per Toohey J R v Baartman (NSWCCA (unreported 6 October 1994) R v Bibic [2000] 112 A Crim R 300 R v Ce [2005] NSWCCA 362 per Grove J at paras 4-5 CASES CITED : R v Chami; R v Sheikh [2002] NSWCCA R v Fernando (1999) NSWCCA 66 at (195-226) R v Lu & Anor [2007] NSWSC 1141 R v Middis NSWSC (unreported) 27 March 1991 per Hunt J R v Merrett 19 A Crim R 363 per Slattery CJ at CL and Carruthers J R v Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190
Regina (C'Wealth) v Omar BALADJAM [No 49] Regina (C'Wealth) v Khaled CHEIKHO Regina (C'Wealth) v Moustafa CHEIKHO PARTIES : Regina (C'Wealth) v Mohamed Ali ELOMAR Regina (C'Wealth) v Abdul Rakib HASAN Regina (C'Wealth) v Mohammed Omar JAMAL Regina (C'Wealth) v Mirsad MULAHALILOVIC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate