NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hancock & Anor v Bilinsky [2007] NSWSC 915
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 August 2007
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The respondent is to provide preliminary discovery of the disk referred to in paragraph [24] of this judgment to the applicants' solicitor within 14 days; (2) The issues of firstly, costs and secondly, whether a Court appointed expert should be appointed are reserved.
CATCHWORDS : Preliminary discovery - disk
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) - s 16 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) - s 347 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) - Part 3 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) - s 3C Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - r 5.3 Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, (19th ed) 2006
Amaltal Corp Ltd v Maruha Corp Ltd [2007] 1 NZLR 608 CASES CITED : C7 Pty Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited [2001] FCA 1864 Magill v Magill (2006) 2126 CLR 551 Papaconstuntinos v Holmes a Court [2006] NSWSC 945
David John Hancock - First Applicant PARTIES : Susan Hancock - Second Applicant Bohdan Bilinsky - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10628/2007
COUNSEL : Mr R D Marshall - Applicants Mr J L Trew QC with Mr A Maroya - Respondent
SOLICITORS : Grasso Searles Romano, Lawyers, Brisbane - Applicants Horowitz & Bilinsky - Respondent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate