NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Australian Beverage Distributors v The Redrock Co [2008] NSWSC 114
HEARING DATE(S) : 19 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 February 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
DECISION : Interlocutory process dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - costs - defendant succeeded in resisting winding up order - defendant's solicitor was paid by third parties - whether defendant entitled to costs order - whether, in fact, defendant and third parties arranged for recoupment of payments if defendant succeeded and obtained order for costs
Civil Procedure Act, 2005 (NSW), s 98 LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 191 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 319
Adams v London Improved Motor Coach Builders Ltd [1921] 1 KB 495 Australian Beverage Distributors Pty Ltd v The Redrock Co Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 3 Backhouse v Judd [1925] SASR 395 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Dyktnyski v BHP Titanium Minerals Pty Ltd (2004) 60 NSWLR 203 Grundmann v Georgeson [2000] QCA 394 CASES CITED : Gundry v Sainsbury [1910] 1 KB 645 Halliday v High Performance Personnel Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 113 ALR 637 McCullum v Ifield (1969) 90 WN (Part 1) (NSW) 525 New Pinnacle Group Silver Mining Co v Luhrig Coal & Ore Dressing Appliances Co (1902) 2 SR (NSW) 50; 19 WN (NSW) 9 R v Archbishop of Canterbury [1903] 1 KB 289 Tarry v Pryce (No 2) (1987) 88 FLR 270 Wentworth v Rogers (2006) 66 NSWLR 474
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate