NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: IE v R [2008] NSWCCA 70
HEARING DATE(S): 27 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Hulme J at 2; Latham J at 6
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal allowed. 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: SENTENCE APPEAL - Aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent (In Company) - juvenile offender - whether youth an objective factor - whether failure to take account of principles under s 6 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 - whether manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987
DB v Regina : DNN v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 27 R v MA [2004] NSWCCA 92 R v AEM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Voss [2003] NSWCCA 182 CASES CITED : R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v P [2004] NSWCCA 218 Langbein v R [2008] NSWCCA 38 Elliot v The Queen ; Blessington v The Queen [2007] HCA 51 R v Reyes [2005] NSWCCA 218 Wray v R [2007] NSWCCA 162
PARTIES: IE - (Applicant) Regina - (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3916
COUNSEL: S. Corish - (Applicant) N. Norman - (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Legal Aid Commission - (Applicant) Solicitor of Public Prosecutions - (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/11/0349
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Shadbolt DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 11 August 2006
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/3916
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate