NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Chandos Developments Pty Ltd v Mulkearns & Anor [2008] NSWCA 62
HEARING DATE(S): 25 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Giles JA at 2; McColl JA at 125
DECISION: Appeal and cross-appeal each dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Vendor and purchaser - sale subject to tenancy - vendor obliged under tenancy agreement to maintain roof - vendor obliged under sale agreement to comply with obligation to tenant to the extent to be complied with prior to completion - roof needed replacing - whether within vendor's obligation to tenant - whether vendor could give notice to complete when roof not replaced - whether vendor could terminate for failure by purchaser to complete although rejecting that had to replace roof - construction of obligation under sale agreement - replacement within vendor's obligations - but vendor not in breach and could give notice to complete - vendor's obligation under sale agreement not essential obligation - vendor could terminate - provisions in sale agreement concerning retention of a licence fee in the event of termination - on construction of provisions, only as security for vendor's loss - purchaser could recover most of licence fee.
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Alexus Pty Ltd v Pont Holdings Ltd (2000) 10 BPR 97848; Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604; Brew Bros Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd (1970) 1 QB 612; Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd (1915) AC 79; Foran v Wight (1989) 168 CLR 385; Foster v Anderson (1908) 16 OLE 565; Glasshouse Investments Pty Ltd v MPJ Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 456; Golding v Vella (2001) 10 BPR 97903; Gustin v Taajamba Pty Ltd (1988) 4 BPR 97274; Halkidis v Bugeia (1974) 1 NSWLR 423; Highfern Pty Ltd v Sibbles (1987) 2 QdR 667; Lindsay v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1961) 106 CLR 377; CASES CITED: Lister v Lane (1893) 2 QB 212; Lurcott v Wakeley (1911) 1 KB 905; Maxsujur Pty Ltd v Asimus (1982) NSWLR 96; McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457; McNally v Waitzer (1981) 1 NSWLR 294; Mehmet v Benson (1965) 113 CLR 295; Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips (1974) 131 CLR 286; PC Developments Pty Ltd v Revell (1991) 22 NSWLR 615; Ping v Pearce Paradise Pty Ltd (1982) 2 BPR 97125; Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; Prosper Homes Ltd v Hambros Bank Executor & Trustee Co Ltd (1979) 39 P & CR 395; Ray v Davies; Dyster v Randall (1926) Ch 932; Roadshow Entertainment Pty Ltd v (ACN 053 006 269) Pty Ltd (1997) 42 NSWLR 463; Torrens v Walker (1906) 2 Ch 166.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate