NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Loupos v Demirgelis [2008] NSWSC 1207
HEARING DATE(S) : 18-21 August, 30 September, 1-3 and 7-9 October 2008.
JUDGMENT DATE : 19 November 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Claim for revocation dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - Probate - Application for revocation of probate - whether testator had testamentary capacity
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
CASES CITED : Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549
PARTIES : Maria Loupos (Plaintiff) Raphael Demirgelis (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 121799/06
COUNSEL : Kim Morrissey (Plaintiff) Ian Davidson (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Hunt and Hunt (Plaintiff) JSM Lawyers (Defendant)
- 34 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION PROBATE LIST
WINDEYER J
Wednesday 19 November 2008
121799/06 Maria Loupos v Raphael Demirgelis in the Estate of John Gannelos (also known as Ioannis Gannelos) JUDGMENT 1 John Gannelos (the deceased) died on 5 February 2006 aged 75. He left a will dated 6 January 2004, probate of which was granted in common form to the defendant Raphael Demirgelis on 28 March 2006. The plaintiff, Mrs Maria Loupos, seeks to revoke that grant and to obtain a grant of letters of administration with a will of the deceased dated 30 November 1979 annexed. The deceased made other wills on 10 June 2003 and 4 December 2003. The defendant by cross claim propounds the will of 10 June 2003 in the event that the present grant is revoked. No one seeks to propound the December 2003 will. The plaintiff, Mrs Loupos, claims that the deceased lacked testamentary capacity at the time of the will dated 6 January 2004 and the will 10 June 2003. If he did, then it is accepted that a grant should be made in favour of the 1979 will. The Wills
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate