NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave dismissed by the High Court (s486/2009) 12 March 2009 [2009] HCASL 53
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Huynh v R [2008] NSWCCA 216
HEARING DATE(S): 12 September 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 September 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Johnson J at 2; Price J at 73
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - supply prohibited drug - related summary offences of dealing with property reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime - special circumstances - sentences not manifestly excessive
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 R v Ibrahim [2005] NSWCCA 43 R v Nightingale [2005] NSWCCA 147 R v Vera [2008] NSWCCA 33 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 CASES CITED : R v MMK (2006) 164 A Crim R 481 R v McDonald (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 12 October 1998) R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v George (2004) 149 A Crim R 38 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v MA (2004) 145 A Crim R 434 R v Thompson (2005) 156 A Crim R 467 R v Clayton (1997) 42 NSWLR 268
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate