NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Susan Elizabeth Salisbury -v- Philip Edward Cullen Waugh [2007] NSWSC 872
HEARING DATE(S) : 19 March 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 August 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice McLaughlin
DECISION : 1. I order that the proceedings be dismissed. 2. I order that the Plaintiff pay the costs of the Defendant. 3. I reserve to the parties liberty to apply for declarations to the effect set forth in paragraph 35.1 (i) and (ii) of the defence. 4. The exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Family Law. De facto relationship. Conduct of farming enterprise by parties. Respective contributions of parties. Contributions of applicant as homemaker and parent. Aquisition of various pieces of real property. Court should not have regard to present or future needs of applicant.
LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Roy v Sturgeon (1986) 11 NSWLR 454 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 Davey v Lee (1990) 13 FamLR 688 Black v Black (1991) 15 FamLR 109 CASES CITED : Wallace v Stanford (1995) 37 NSWLR 1 Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSW LR 70 Browne v Green (1999) 25 FamLR 482 Jones v Grech [2001] NSWCA 208 Bilous v Moudaliar [2006] NSWCA 38 Kardos v Sarbutt (2006) DFC 95-332
PARTIES : Susan Elizabeth Salisbury (Plaintiff) Philip Edward Cullen Waugh (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3579 of 2005
COUNSEL : Mr T. Tockar (Plaintiff) Mr J. Lloyd (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Peter Marr & Associates Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Doyle Wilson (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate