NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Makarov v R (No. 1) [2008] NSWCCA 291
HEARING DATE(S): 5 May 2008; 6 May 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 December 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Bell JA at 1; Johnson J at 1; McCallum J at 1
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - sexual assault offences - complainant a concert pianist and student of appellant - whether Crown was obliged to call expert evidence concerning impossibility of performing as a concert pianist when under stress - whether verdicts unreasonable or not able to be supported having regard to the evidence - whether inconsistent verdicts - claim that trial miscarried through failure to provide simultaneous headphone translation facilities - alleged inadequacies in trial Judge's directions - alleged bias of trial Judge - alleged incompetence of Counsel - alleged wrongful admission of evidence of admissions - alleged wrongful admission of hearsay evidence - character - no error established - rational basis for different verdicts - no miscarriage of justice demonstrated - appeal against conviction dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Dossi (1918) 13 Cr App R 158 Ignjatic v R [1993] 68 A Crim R 333 Makarov v R (No. 2) [2008] NSWCCA 292 Makarov v R (No. 3) [2008] NSWCCA 293 Markby v R (1978) 140 CLR 108 R v Kennedy (2000) 118 A Crim R 34; [2000] NSWCCA 487 CASES CITED : R v McKnoulty (1995) 77 A Crim R 333 R v Southammavong; R v Sihavong [2003] NSWCCA 312 R v Stringer [2000] NSWCCA 293; 116 A Crim R 198 R v VHP (unreported) Court of Criminal Appeal, 7 July 1997 Simic v R (1980) 144 CLR 319 Smale v R [2007] NSWCCA 328 Walters v The Queen [1969] 2 AC 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate