NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Riz & 1 or v Perpetual Trustee Australia Ltd & 4 ors (Costs) [2007] NSWSC 1488
HEARING DATE(S) : 13 November 2007 JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 13 November 2007
DECISION : No sufficient reason to make unsuccessful defendant liable for successful defendant's costs
CATCHWORDS : COSTS – whether unsuccessful defendant should indemnify plaintiff in respect of liability for successful defendant's costs – where plaintiff fails on Contract Review claim against mortgagee but succeeds on professional negligence claim against solicitor
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Contracts Review Act 1980, ss 7 & 9
Almeida v Universal Dye Works Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 156 CASES CITED : Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v Keogh [1999] NSWSC 883 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Palmer (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 140 Coombes v Roads and Traffic Authority (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 70
Omar Riz (first plaintiff/first cross defendant) Amal Riz (second plaintiff/second cross defendant) Perpetual Trustee Australia Limited (first defendant/cross claimant) PARTIES : Direct Mortgage Solutions Pty Limited (second defendant) Manuelpillia Paul Dominic (third defendant) Suzy David (fourth defendant) Fred David (fifth defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20591/02
C J Leggat SC w B M Zipser (plaintiffs/cross defendants) COUNSEL : J G Bates (first defendant/cross claimant & second defendant) R J H Darke SC w M C L Dicker (third - fifth defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate