NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Chu [2008] NSWCA 14
HEARING DATE(S): 4 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 March 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Bell JA at 2; Mathews AJ at 3
1. Appeal allowed in part. DECISION: 2. Cross-appeal allowed in part. 3. Verdict of $217,324.00 substituted for the verdict of $239,405.00, to take effect as at 4 April 2007. 4. Appellant to pay 90% of the costs of the respondent of the appeal and cross-appeal, and the respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act in respect of the balance of her own costs.
CATCHWORDS: Appeal - negligence - contributory negligence - damages - whether subsequent sexual assault compensable by defendant - novus actus interveniens - damages recalculated in part
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002 Suitors' Fund Act 1951
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Green v Hanson Construction Material Pty Limited [2007] QCA 260 CASES CITED: Mahony v J Kruschich (Demolitions) Proprietary Limited and Another (1985) 156 CLR 522 M'Kew v Holland & Hannen Cubitts 1970 SC (HL) 20 Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare (1992) 176 CLR 408 Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil (2000) 176 ALR 411
PARTIES: State Rail Authority of New South Wales (Appellant) Yu-Mei Chu (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40235/07
COUNSEL: M Williams SC (Appellant) S Norton SC/M Fraser (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Gillis Delaney Lawyers (Appellant) Accentro Legal (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate