NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mindshare Communications Ltd v Orleans Investments Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 976
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 August 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : All reasonable steps had been taken to secure attendance of witness.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE [53] – Admissibility and relevancy – Hearsay – Particular cases – Exclusion of hearsay rule – Evidence Act 1995 s 63 – Civil proceedings – Person who made previous representation not available to give evidence – Meaning of not available – Whether all reasonable steps have been taken to secure his attendance but without success.
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss 63, 65 & Dictionary Part 2 cl 4
AJW v New South Wales [2003] NSWSC 803 Caterpillar Inc v John Deere Limited (No 2) (2001) 81 ALR 108 Longhurst v Hunt [2004] 42 MVR 267 R v Alchin (2006) 200 FLR 204 CASES CITED : R v Kazzi [2003] NSWCCA 138 R v Suteski (2002) 56 NSWLR 182 Sneza Suteski (2002) 128 A Crim R 275 Wilinksi v Federal Express Pty Ltd (1997) 14 NSWCCR 546 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Walter Construction Group Pty Ltd [2002] NSWIRComm 165
Mindshare Communications Limited, Taiwan Branch (P) PARTIES : Orleans Investments Pty Limited t/as The Orleans Media Consultancy (D1) Wayne Eckett (D2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1157/05
COUNSEL : N C Hutley SC and J K Kirk (P) K G Odgers (Ds)
SOLICITORS : Allens Arthur Robinson (P) Breene & Breen Solicitors (Ds)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate