NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Spathis v Nanos [2008] NSWSC 418
HEARING DATE(S) : 5 May 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 May 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Jagot AJ
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - co-owner seeking sale under s 66G of Conveyancing Act 1919 - defendant keen to purchase plaintiff's share of property - whether orders should be made appointing trustees for sale - if orders made whether orders should be moulded to accommodate defendant's wish to purchase following valuation - orders under s 66G made
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Cain v Cain [2007] NSWSC 623 Callahan v O'Neill [2002] NSWSC 877 Grizonic v Suttor (2004) 12 BPR 22,797 CASES CITED : Hogan v Baseden (1997) 8 BPR 15,723 Ngatoa v Ford (1990) 19 NSWLR 72 Tory v Tory [2007] NSWSC 1078 Williams v Legg (1993) 29 NSWLR 687
PLAINTIFF Gerasimos Spathis PARTIES : DEFENDANT Amalia Nanos
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4498 of 2007
COUNSEL : Mr I E Davidson - plaintiff Mr S W Climpson - defendant
SOLICITORS : JSM Lawyers - plaintiff James Lawyers - defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
Jagot AJ
13 May 2008
4498 of 2007 GERASIMOS SPATHIS v AMALIA NANOS JUDGMENT 1 HER HONOUR: This is an application under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 for an order appointing trustees for the sale of land known as 39 – 45 Tickner Street, Castlereagh.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate