NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Trewin v Felton [2007] NSWSC 851
HEARING DATE(S) : 14-17 May 2007 Written submissions 20 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 August 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : Defendant is entitled to fence and gate corridor, but not so as to deny plaintiffs suitable access points, to permit reasonable user by them of right of carriageway. In current configuration, 13 metre access point exhausts limits of reasonable access. Plaintiffs are entitled to mandatory injunction requiring demolition of gateposts, but not in respect of other alleged obstructions. Defendant is entitled to injunction restraining plaintiffs from authorising persons to use carriageway without ensuring that they do not park or remain in it. Defendant is not entitled to order modifying or partially extinguishing the easement.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY – Torrens title – Easements – Right of carriageway – Construction – where created by s 88B instrument – where easement runs along length of a boundary of dominant land – extent of access points permitted from easement to dominant land – servient owner's right to gate and fence easement – whether dominant owner entitled to park or remain on easement – Modification and extinguishment – whether obsolete – whether impedes reasonable user of servient land without securing practical benefit to dominant land – whether abandoned – whether can be modified without substantial injury to dominant owner – Obstruction – by gateposts – by gate – by fence – by parking – remedies – mandatory injunction – Trespass – by excessive user – parking by users authorised by dominant owner – remedies – injunction restraining authorising use without ensuring users do not park
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate