NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Auburn Council v Austin Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2007] NSWSC 286
HEARING DATE(S) : 30/3/07 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2007
DECISION : Claim to indemnity costs disallowed.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Indemnity cost - Principles
Colgate-Palmolive & Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 118 ALR 248 Crisp v Kent [unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal, 27 September 1993] Harrison & Anor v Schipp; Cameron & Anor v Schipp [2001] NSWCA 13 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 CASES CITED : Maitland Hospital v Fisher (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 Messiter v Hutchinson (1987) 10 NSWLR 525 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 Tetijo Holdings Pty Ltd v Keeprite Australia Pty Ltd [unreported, Federal Court of Australia, French J, 3 May 1991] Thors v Weekes (1989) 92 ALR 131
PARTIES : Auburn Council (Plaintiff) Austin Australia Pty Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50138/06
COUNSEL : Mr TEF Hughes QC, Mr ID Faulkner SC, Mr MK Condon (Plaintiff) Mr J Simpkins SC, Mr AA Henskens (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Matthews Folbigg Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
Einstein J
Friday 30 March 2007 ex tempore Revised 2 April 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate