NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave dismissed by the High Court - 5 December 2008
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Graham v R [2008] NSWCCA 174
HEARING DATE(S): 10 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 July 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Price J at 2; McCallum J at 55
DECISION: (i) Leave to appeal be granted. (ii) The appeal against the convictions be dismissed. (iii) In relation to the sentence appeal, quash the sentence imposed by the Judge on count 6. (iv) Sentence the appellant on count 6 to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 6 years 5 months to date from 19 June 2006 and expire on 18 November 2012 and a balance of term of 3 years 1 month expiring on 18 December 2015. The earliest date on which the appellant will be eligible for release to parole is 18 November 2012.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - conviction and sentence appeal - sexual crimes - different jury verdicts - jury verdicts not unreasonable - proper allowance not made for special circumstances
Crimes Act 1900 s 61I, s 61P LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(1), s 6(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 44(2)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 CASES CITED : Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 474 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 140
PARTIES: Graham Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/5186
COUNSEL: T Game SC (Applicant) D Woodburne (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S O'Connor Legal Aid Commission S Kavanagh Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate