NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Metlife Insurance Ltd v Visy Board Pty Ltd & 25 ors [2007] NSWSC 1415
HEARING DATE(S) : 12 November 2007 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Expedition List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12 November 2007
DECISION : Tenders admitted
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE – Relevance – Provisional relevance – Evidence Act, s 57 - EVIDENCE – Admissions – Authority – Evidence Act, s 87 - EVIDENCE – whether unduly prejudicial – Evidence Act, s 135 - EVIDENCE – rectification suit – evidence of post-contractual facts
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, ss 57, 69(3), 87, 135
Metlife Insurance Limited (plaintiff) Visy Board Pty Limited (1st defendant) Visy Paper Pty Limited (2nd defendant) Visy Board Superannuation Pty Limited (3rd defendant) Arpad Kozma (4th defendant) Colin Frewen (5th defendant) Reginald De Livera (6th defendant) Stephen Smith (7th defendant) Florian Karwacki (8th defendant) Sylvia Kleinman (9th defendant) Oscar Marconi (10th defendant) Petru Suciu (11th defendant) Thomas Hall (12th defendant) PARTIES : Mark Williams (13th defendant) Concetta Tedesco (14th defendant) Don Rakoci (15th defendant) Slako Gorguc (16th defendant) Shane Rogers (17th defendant) Maurice Rafidi (18th defendant) Edward Denko (19th defendant) Maria Drago (20th defendant) Milenco Baloi (21st defendant) Cane Mickovski (22nd defendant) Eyup Turkoglu (23rd defendant) Ugur Arslan (24th defendant) Gregory Sabitino (25th defendant) Ramadan Salievski (26th defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate