NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : TCS ACES Pty Limited v Mikohn Gaming Australasia Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 988
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 August 2007 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Duty List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 31 August 2007
DECISION : Interlocutory injunction granted restraining defendant from alienating benefit of licence agreement
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS – implied terms – duty to facilitate performance – implied negative obligation to refrain from doing anything to deprive other party of benefit of contract – where distributor entitled to remuneration calculated by reference to licence fees derived by principal from product placed by distributor – where principal proposes to assign benefit of licence agreements - INJUNCTIONS – interlocutory injunction – where principal threatens to alienate benefit of licence agreements to third party in breach of implied negative stipulation – whether damages a sufficient remedy
CASES CITED : Crawford Fitting Co v Sydney Valve & Fittings Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 438
PARTIES : TCS ACES Pty Limited (plaintiff) Mikohn Gaming Australasia Pty Limited (defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50138/07
COUNSEL : Mr N A Cotman SC (plaintiff) Ms K J Williams (defendant)
SOLICITORS : Ebsworth & Ebsworth (plaintiff) Deacons (defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION DUTY LIST
BRERETON J
Friday, 31 August 2007
50138/07 TCS ACES Pty Limited v Mikohn Gaming Australasia Pty Limited JUDGMENT (ex tempore) 1 HIS HONOUR: The defendant Mikohn Gaming Australasia Pty Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Progressive Gaming International Corporation Inc (PGIC), a leading supplier of integrated casino and jackpot management solutions for the gaming industry worldwide. By a Distribution and Service Agreement dated 10 April 2003, Mikohn appointed the plaintiff TCS ACES Pty Limited to be exclusive distributor in a territory which included Australia, New Zealand and various other countries in the Asia-Pacific region of Mikohn's range of progressive, bonus and non-progressive table games, for an initial period of four years, automatically renewed from year to year thereafter unless either party had, not less than six months prior to the expiration of the initial term or each anniversary thereafter, given six months notice of termination to the other (clause 2.1). Clause 2.2 provided that the agreement terminated forthwith upon the occurrence of any of a number of specified events, including failure to perform an obligation under the agreement and to rectify the default within 30 days after receipt of notice of default (clause 2.2.1), entry into a deed of assignment or deed of arrangement adversely affecting the ability of either party to perform its obligations without the approval of the other (clause 2.2.2), ceasing or threatening to cease to carry on business or going into liquidation (clause 2.2.3), being placed under official management (clause 2.2.4), undergoing a change in shareholding or officeholders which, in the reasonable opinion of the other party, has an adverse effect on the ability of the party to perform its obligations (2.2.5), or if an officer or director is declared bankrupt, enters into a scheme of arrangement or goes into liquidation (2.2.6). 2 By clause 3.1, ACES agreed to procure the execution of new licence arrangements between Mikohn and customers for Mikohn's products, and Mikohn agreed to sign such licence agreements. Mikohn derives its income, relevantly, by providing table games to casinos under licence agreements in respect of which the casino pays Mikohn a licence fee. Clauses 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 impose additional obligations on ACES to foster and promote the distribution of Mikohn's products. 3 Clause 4.1 requires ACES to provide certain maintenance and support services to Mikohn's customers. Clause 4.2 requires ACES to provide certain storage facilities for parts and inventory, and clause 4.4 requires ACES to keep a stock of inventory. 4 Mikohn's duties under the Distribution and Service Agreement are specified in clause 5. None of them are immediately relevant. 5 Clause 6, entitled "Payment", provides as follows: 6.1 Mikohn will continue to pay for ACES the amount due under previous contracts and existing installations including the placement fee and service fees as set out in the attached Schedule A. The fees payable will be reduced accordingly in the event product numbers are reduced in those installations.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate