NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: John Ian FISHER v R [2008] NSWCCA 129
HEARING DATE(S): 6 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 June 2008
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Hidden J at 31
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentences - pleas of guilty - aggravated sexual assault - aggravated indecent assault - counts on indictment were representative - whether uncharged criminal conduct taken into account as an aggravating feature - whether sentence manifestly excessive - appeal dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
CASES CITED : The Queen De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209
PARTIES: John Ian FISHER (applicant) REGINA (respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3127
COUNSEL: S Corish (applicant) N Adams (respondent)
SOLICITORS: S O'Connor - Legal Aid Commission (applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 07/31/0004
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2007/3127
McCLELLAN CJ at CL SIMPSON J HIDDEN J
20 June 2008 John FISHER v R Judgment
1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL: I agree with Simpson J. 2 SIMPSON J: The applicant seeks leave to appeal against sentences imposed upon him in the District Court at East Maitland on 24 July 2007, following his pleas of guilty to five charges of offences of a sexual nature. Two of the offences were of aggravated sexual assault, contrary to s 61J(1) of the Crimes Act 1900, which provides a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 20 years. Pursuant to Pt 4 Div 1A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ("the Sentencing Procedure Act"), a standard non-parole period of 10 years is prescribed. The remaining three counts were of aggravated indecent assault, contrary to s 61M(1) of the Crimes Act, each of which carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 7 years, and in respect of which a standard non-parole period of 5 years is prescribed. 3 In respect of the first count of aggravated sexual assault English DCJ imposed a total term of imprisonment for 10 years, made up of a non-parole period of 6 years, commencing on 22 March 2008. On each of the remaining counts her Honour imposed fixed terms of imprisonment of, respectively, 4 years, 6 months, 2 years and 4 years; the first was also specified to commence on 22 March 2008, and therefore run concurrently with that earlier imposed; the remaining sentences were specified to commence on 22 March 2007. 4 The overall effective sentence was therefore a sentence of imprisonment for 11 years with a non-parole period of 7 years. 5 In so sentencing the applicant English DCJ found, pursuant to s 44(2) of the Sentencing Procedure Act, that special circumstances justifying departure from the proportions between the head sentence and the non-parole period existed. She gave effect to this finding by imposing an overall non-parole period that is sixty-four percent of the overall term.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate