NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave application refused with costs by the High Court – 14 November 2008
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144
HEARING DATE(S): 29 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 June 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Beazley JA at 27; Giles JA at 28; Tobias JA at 77; Campbell JA at 240
1. Appeal allowed. DECISION: 2. Set aside the verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant and any accompanying order for costs; in lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the first defendant against the plaintiff and order the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs. 3. Cross-appeal dismissed. 4. First respondent pay the appellant's costs of the appeal against the verdict and judgment in her favour; appellant pay the second respondent's costs of the appeal against the verdict in its favour; cross-appellant pay the costs of the cross-appeal .
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE – Civil Liability Act 2002 – Duty of care – Pedestrian – Footpath under management of Council – Communications pit lid defective – Breach of duty of care at construction and/or subsequently – Negligent inspection – Immunity of councils for non-feasance under s 45 Civil Liability Act – Whether Council had actual knowledge of risk of harm – Whether primary judge made finding of actual knowledge - EVIDENCE – Interpretation of photographs by trial judge – Whether photographs may be used as substantive evidence or merely demonstrative evidence
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002 sections 5B, 45
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Beaton v McDivitt (1985) 13 NSWLR 134; (1985) 3 BPR 9576 Birch v Australian Mutual Provident Society [1906] HCA 51; (1906) 4 CLR 324 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council [2001] HCA 29; (2001) 206 CLR 512; (2001) 180 ALR 145; (2001) 75 ALJR 992 C Van der Lely NV v Bamfords Ltd [1963] RPC 61 Georgopoulos v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2004] NSWCA 266 Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council [2001] HCA 29; (2001) 206 CLR 512; (2001) 180 ALR 145; (2001) 75 ALJR 992 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2005] NSWCA 432 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2007] HCA 6; 230 CLR 22; (2007) 81 ALJR 686; (2007) 153 LGERA 55 Leichhardt Council v Serratore [2005] NSWCA 406 Lindistane Roxsana Aitken v Telstra Corporation District Court, unreported 10 March 1997 CASES CITED: North Sydney Council v Roman [2007] NSWCA 27; (2007) 69 NSWLR 240; (2007) 150 LGERA 419 People v Bowley 59 Cal 2d 855; 382 P 2d 591 (CA, 1963) Reg v Travers (1958) 58 SR (NSW) 85 Rickards v Australian Telecommunications Commission [1983] 3 NSWLR 155 Schmidt v Schmidt [1969] QWN 3 Short v Barrett [1990] NSWCA 164; unreported, 5 October 1990; BC9003193 State v Pulphus 465 A 2d 153 (RI, 1983) Stillwell Trucks v McKay; Stillwell Trucks v TNT [2002] NSWCA 292 United States Shipping Board v The Ship St Albans [1931] AC 632 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; (2005) 223 CLR 422 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt [1980] HCA 12; (1980) 146 CLR 40
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate