NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 188 A Crim R 581
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : PETERS v ASPLUND & HER HONOUR, MAGISTRATE O'SHANE [2008] NSWSC 1061
HEARING DATE(S) : 1, 2 and 3 October 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 9 October 2008
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1
DECISION : Subpoena not issued in compliance with s.222 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Warrant for plaintiff's arrest quashed.
CATCHWORDS : SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF COMPUTER IMAGE – WARRANT ISSUED FOR ARREST OF POLICE OFFICER –subpoena addressed to "South Australia Police" – not a "person named" as required by provisions of Part 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – nil return on subpoena – warrant issued by Magistrate for arrest of a police officer invalid – statutory conditions prescribed by s.229 of the Criminal Procedure Act for issue of a warrant not established – not open to Magistrate to be "satisfied" of matters specified in s.229(2)(a) and (b) of the Act – onus of proof with respect to the issue of a warrant for arrest – no application before the Magistrate for the issue of a warrant as required by s.229(1) of the Act – no evidence to establish "no just or reasonable excuse" offered for the failure to comply – provisions of s.229 of the Act require an opportunity to establish "just and reasonable excuse" – Magistrate in breach of requirements of procedural fairness in refusing adjournment sought on behalf of South Australia Police – subpoena not issued in compliance with the Act – warrant for plaintiff's arrest invalid – order that warrant be quashed.
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Court Act 1982 Police Act 1998 (SA) Supreme Court Act 1970 Criminal Law Act 1977 (UK)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate