NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rail Corporation New South Wales v Leduva Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 571
HEARING DATE(S) : 29/05/07, 30/05/07, 31/05/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 June 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Application to enforce undertaking as to damages to be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Equity - Interlocutory injunctions - Enforcement of usual undertaking as to damages - Principles applicable when proceedings do not progress to final hearing - Injunction granted upon defendant's breach of Development Deed relating to the construction of a building adjacent to a railway tunnel - Court discretion whether to enforce the undertaking - Principled exercise of discretion requires consideration of all circumstances of case - Defendant concedes that interlocutory injunction properly given at the time - Injunction dissolved by consent after subsequent reports from engineering experts retained by plaintiff confirmed a negligible risk to the tunnel
LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Air Express Ltd v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (1980-1981) 146 CLR 249 Attorney-General for Ontario v Harry (1982) 25 CPC 67; (1982) 35 OR (2d) 248 Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society v Ricketts [1993] 1 WLR 1545 Doherty v Allman (1878) 3 App Cas 709 F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary for Trade & Industry [1975] AC 295 Financiera Avenida SA v Shiblaq Times 7 November 1990 (CA (Civ Div)) Graham v Campbell (1878) 7 Ch D 490 Re Halistone (1910) 102 LT 877 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 CASES CITED : Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874) LR 5 PC 221 Modern Transport Co Ltd v Duneric Steamship Co [1917] 1 KB 370 Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto v NB Theatrical Agencies Inc (1991) 76 DLR (4th) 522 Newby v Harrison (1861) 2 De GJ & J 287 Redwin Industries Pty Ltd v Feetsafe Pty Ltd and Anor [2002] VSC 427 Roberts v Walter Developments Pty Ltd & Ors [unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Wheeler J, 13 June 1997] Smith v Day (1882) 21 Ch D 421 Upper Canada College v City of Toronto (1917) 40 OLR 483 Ushers Brewery Ltd v P S King & Co (Finance) Ltd [1972] Ch 148 Vieweger Construction Co Ltd v Rush & Tompkins Construction Ltd (1964) 48 DLR (2d) 509; Yukong Line Ltd v Rendsburg Investment Corp [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 113 (CA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate