NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Timothy Neil McQueen v Leduva Pty Limited [2008] NSWSC 284
HEARING DATE(S) : 25 & 26 March 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Hammerschlag J
DECISION : Verdict for defendant vendor
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - Vendor - purchaser suit - whether purchaser's conduct amounted to repudiation - Notice to Complete - whether period given sufficient to make time of the essence - right to recover deposit
LEGISLATION CITED : Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 (NSW)
Caleo Bros Pty Ltd v Lyons Bros (Aust) Pty Ltd (1980) NSW ConvR 55-004 Castle Hill Tyres Pty Ltd v Luxspice Pty Ltd (1996) 7 BPR 14,959 Sindel v Georgiou (1984) 154 CLR 661 McNally v Waitzer [1981] 1 NSWLR 294 Halkidis v Bugeia [1974] 1 NSWLR 423 Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623 CASES CITED : Afovos Shipping Co SA v Pagnan [1983] 1 WLR 195 Sunbird Plaza Pty Ltd v Maloney (1988) 166 CLR 245 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 444 DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423 Lohar Corp Pty Ltd v Dibu Pty Ltd (1976) 1 BPR 9177 TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Hayden Enterprises Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 130 Alghussein Establishment v Eton College [1991] All ER 267
PARTIES : Timothy Neil McQueen Leduva Pty Limited (ACN 001 777 206)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5914/2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate