NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: VERSLUYS v R [2008] NSWCCA 76
HEARING DATE(S): 25 March 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Simpson J at 47; Price J at 48
DECISION: 1. Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 2. Dismiss the appeal against conviction and sentence.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction and sentence - murder - strangulation of de facto partner - whether conviction for murder unsafe and unsatisfactory - whether evidence only supported a conviction for manslaughter - whether appellant had an intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm - whether trial judge gave balanced summing up - whether matter fell within middle range of objective seriousness - whether trial judge erred in imposing standard non-parole period
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Apps v R [2006] NSWCCA 290 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 CASES CITED : MLP v R (2006) 164 A Crim R 93; NSWCCA 271 R v Slater (2001) 121 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 65 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575; [2004] NSWCCA 434
PARTIES: Lee Thomas Versluys (Appellant) The Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3222
A Haesler SC (Appellant on sentence only) COUNSEL: Appellant in person on conviction L Babb SC/M Rabsch (Crown)
SOLICITORS: Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Appellant on sentence) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2005/839
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate