NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Application of PL, re TB and FB [2007] NSWSC 665
HEARING DATE(S) : In chambers
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 June 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Adoptions List
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
DECISION : See under heading "Conclusion"
CATCHWORDS : Adoption of children - sole application by step parent - requirements as to evidence of financial circumstances - access to s 91 report
LEGISLATION CITED : Adoption Act 2000 (NSW), ss 27, 30, 90, 91, 95, 194 Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 73 r 13
PL (Applicant) PARTIES : TB (Child) FB (Child)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 15/2007
COUNSEL : Nil
SOLICITORS : Nil
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION ADOPTIONS LIST
AUSTIN J
THURSDAY 21 JUNE 2007
15/2007 APPLICATION OF PL, RE TB AND FB JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: This is an application for adoption made by a step father who is married to and living with the birth mother of the two children who are to be adopted. The applicant is not legally represented.
2 The application is not contested. Although the applicant seeks orders dispensing with notice to and consent by the birth father and has tendered substantial evidence to support the making of those orders, and there are some other aspects of the application that have required careful attention, this is not a case where the Court would in the normal course publish reasons for judgment. However, some issues have been raised in correspondence from the applicant that need to be addressed in published reasons.
3 When I received and reviewed the Court's adoption file for the purpose of considering the application, I found that the application was deficient or in need of clarification in four respects, and on my instructions these deficiencies were drawn to the attention of the applicant in the form, in effect, of a letter of requisition.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate