NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) 25 ACLC 1,216
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Radiancy (Sales) Pty Limited v Bimat Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 962
HEARING DATE(S) : 5 & 6 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 31 August 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : See para 84 of judgment
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – Winding up in insolvency – Failure to comply with statutory demand –No application to have statutory demand set aside within time-limit – Factors to be taken into account in determining whether to grant leave under s 459S of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to oppose winding-up application – Leave granted to oppose winding up application – Application for summary dismissal of originating process on grounds of abuse of process – Party who is not a creditor has no standing to bring winding-up proceedings – Creditor's standing not established where leave has been granted to oppose winding-up application on ground that debt genuinely disputed – Pursuit of winding-up application absent standing constitutes abuse of process – Order that originating process be dismissed. - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Abuse of process – Institution of parallel proceedings not ipso facto an abuse of process.
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 (NSW)
Switz Pty Ltd v Glowbind Pty Ltd (2000) 48 NSWLR 661 House of Tan Pty Ltd v Beachiris Pty Ltd (1996) 21 ACSR 527 State Bank of NSW v Tela Pty Ltd (No. 2) (2002) 188 ALR 702; [2002] NSWSC 20 Braams Group Pty Ltd v Miric (2002) 171 FLR 449; (2002) 44 ACSR 124 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Paliflex (1999) 149 FLR 179; (1999) 17ACLC 467 Bibby Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd v Wolf Industries Australia Pty Ltd (2004) 182 FLR 49; [2004] NSWSC 134 Portrait Express (Sales) Pty Ltd v Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1996) 132 FLR 300; (1996) 14 ACLC 1095 B & M Quality Constructions Pty Ltd v Buyrite Steel Supplies Pty Ltd (1994) 15 ACSR 433; (1994) 13 ACLC 88 Delta Beta Pty Ltd v Vissers (1996) 20 ACSR 583 Anderson Formrite Pty Ltd v CASC Hire Pty Ltd (2005) 147 FCR 379; (2006) 24 ACLC 154 Hamilhall Pty Ltd (in liq) v AT Phillips Pty Ltd (1994) 54 FCR 173 CASES CITED : Dolvelle Pty Ltd v Australian Macfarms Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 717 Victorian Workcover Authority v Kay's Pty Ltd (2001) 39 ACSR 281 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 Australian Beverage Distributors Pty Ltd v Evans & Tate Premium Wines Pty Ltd (2007) 61 ACSR 441; (2007) 25 ACLC 230 Mann v Goldstein [1968] 1 WLR 1091; [1968] 2 All ER 769 CVC Investments Pty Ltd v P & T Aviation Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 295 Roy Morgan Research Center Pty Ltd v Wilson Market Research Pty Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 311 Tokich Holdings Pty Ltd v Sheraton Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (2004) 185 FLR 130; (2004) 22 ACLC 955 Masri Apartments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Perpetual Nominees Ltd (2004) 22 ACLC 1,411; (2004) 209 ALR 86 L & D Audio Acoustics Pty Ltd v Pioneer Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (1982) 1 ACLC 536; (1982) 7 ACLR 180 Redglove Holdings Pty Ltd v GNE & Associates Pty Ltd (2001) 165 FLR 72; [2001] NSWSC 867 Brolrik Pty Ltd v Sambah Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 164 FLR 91; (2001) 40 ACSR 361 Portfolio Projects Pty Ltd v Oakes Building Co. Pty Ltd (1987) 5 ACLC 911
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate