NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina (C'Wealth) v Baladjam & Ors [No 14] [2008] NSWSC 1438
HEARING DATE(S) : 28/04/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 May 2008
JURISDICTION : Criminal
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : I decline to exclude the evidence of Moustafa Cheikho's identification.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Application to exclude evidence under s 138 of Evidence Act - No illegality or impropriety - Relationship between ASIO and AFP - Crimes Act (C'Wealth) - s 3ZO - Relevant factors under s 138 Evidence Act 1995
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
DPP v AM [2006] 161 A Crim R 219 R v Alexander (1991) 45 CLR 395 R v Baladjam & Ors [No 7}, unreported 15 April 2008 R v Coombe NSWCCA , Hunt CJ, Smart and McInerney JJ, 24 April 1997 - unreported BC9701438 CASES CITED : R v Coulstock (1998) 99 A Crim R 143 R v Cornwell [2003] 57 NSWLR 82 R v Petroulias (No 8) [2007] NSWSC 82 R v Petroulias (No 9) [2007] NSWSC 84 Robinson v Woolworths Limited [2005] 64 NSWLR 612
Regina (C'Wealth) v Omar BALADJAM [No 14] Regina (C'Wealth) v Khaled CHEIKHO Regina (C'Wealth) v Moustafa CHEIKHO Regina (C'Wealth) v Mohamed Ali ELOMAR PARTIES : Regina (C'Wealth) v Abdul Rakib HASAN Regina (C'Wealth) v Mohammed Omar JAMAL Regina (C'Wealth) v Mirsad MULAHALILOVIC Regina (C'Wealth) v Khaled SHARROUF Regina (C'Wealth) v Mazen TOUMA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate