NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Anthony Magafas & Anor v Peter Carantinos & Anor [2008] NSWSC 691
HEARING DATE(S) : 13/6/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 July 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : The plaintiffs have made good their entitlement to orders 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 as sought in the notice of motion.
CATCHWORDS : Statute - Construction - Proper construction of s 241(1)(c) Corporations Act - Section 241 Corporations Act allows the Court to make any orders and give any directions in relation to these proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Magafas v Carantinos [2006] NSWSC 1459 CASES CITED : Isak Constructions v Faress [2005] NSWSC 679 Magafas v Carantinos [2007] NSWSC 416 Magafas v Carantinos [2007] NSWSC 917
TEXTS CITED : Concise Oxford Dictionary, 10th Ed (1999) Oxford University Press
Anthony Magafas (First Plaintiff) Pac Com Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) Peter Carantinos (First Defendant) PARTIES : Fotini Carantinos (Second Defendant) Artesian Pty Limited (Third Defendant) Ms Athena Touriki (Fourth Defendant) Mr Gregory Gav (Fifth Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2670/06
Mr Alexis SC, Mr Golledge (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : Mr K Munro (First and Second Defendants) Mr Blyth (Fourth Defendant) Mr Studdy (Fifth Defendant)
Rockliffs (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : Munro Lawyers (First and Second Defendants) Middletons (Fourth Defendant) Nicholas G Pappas & Company (Fifth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate