NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (In Liq) & 1 Or v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 258
HEARING DATE(S) : 09/11/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : 1. Order that paragraphs 2-4 of the interlocutory process filed on 9 June 2006 be dismissed; 2. order that the defendant pay the plaintiffs' costs of paragraphs 2-4 of the interlocutory process.; If either party contends that a different order should be made, they should notify my associate and the opposite party in writing within 21 days enclosing written submissions on that question, and I will list the matter at a convenient time. ; 3. Order that if no such application is made within 21 days, the costs of the defendant's application in paragraph 1 of the interlocutory process filed on 9 June 2006 be costs in the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Discovery and inspection of documents – Grounds for resisting production – Client legal privilege – Whether draft expert report, letters of instruction from clients' solicitors to expert witness, and notes prepared for preparation of final report are privileged – Waiver of privilege – Whether privilege waived by service of final expert report – Whether draft reports, letters of instruction and notes influenced content of final report so that use or service of final report inconsistent with maintaining privilege in those materials – Waiver of privilege by voluntary disclosure – Held: draft expert report and preliminary letters of instruction from clients' solicitors to expert witness, privileged because created for dominant purpose of plaintiff being provided with legal services – Privilege not waived. - PROCEDURE – Discovery and inspection of documents – Grounds for resisting production – Exclusion of evidence of settlement negotiations – Communication of extract of document made in the course of settlement negotiations – Held that defendant not entitled to inspect balance of document. - Considered: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 117, 119, 122, 126, 131(1) - PROCEDURE – Discovery and inspection of documents – Grounds for resisting production – Relevance – Documents created during later period reflecting historical financial position of company – Oppression – Where process of giving discovery of certain class of documents would be onerous – Discovery not necessary – Utility of discovery outweighed by burden – Discovery not ordered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate