NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : PENDER v ROBWENPHI PTY LIMITED & ANOR [2008] NSWSC 1144
HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 12 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 October 2008
JURISDICTION : Administrative Law
JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1
DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – CTTT appeal – appeal under s.67 against Tribunal decision on a question with respect to a matter of law – whether discretion under s.94(1)(A) of the Home Building Act 1989 properly exercised – whether relevant matters taken into account – whether irrelevant matters taken into account – in determining what was "just and equitable" - Tribunal had exercised discretion to award monies to builder on a quantum meruit basis – alleged error in exercise of discretion – whether failure to exercise discretion according to law and whether regard to irrelevant considerations – alleged error in permitting recovery of monies on a quantum meruit basis – whether absence of evidence to support quantum meruit claim – adequacy of Tribunal's reasons for decision, findings implicit in conclusions in decision – no error of law – assessment of "benefit" and "acceptance of benefit" matters of fact for Tribunal's evaluation - Tribunal had exercised its discretion to award costs – whether cl.20(3) of Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Regulation requiring "exceptional circumstances" before a costs order may be made – Tribunal's reasons deficient but Court affirmed Tribunal's decision under s.67(3) of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Act as an appropriate order.
Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Regulation 2002 Courts and Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2008 Home Building Act 1989
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate