NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina (C'Wealth) v Baladjam & Ors [No 38] [2008] NSWSC 1458
HEARING DATE(S) : 4/08/08; 5/08/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2008
JURISDICTION : Criminal
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : Order 1 in Notice of Motion dated 4 June 2008 made. Secondly, order that ASIO be excused from producing the documents referred to in each of the five categories set out in the subpoena and call of 13 May 2008.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Conspiracy charge - principles relevant to proof of a criminal conspiracy - The nature of evidence limited as to the existence and scope of conspiracy - Evidence Act 1995 - Whether s 87(1)(c) of Evidence Act substantially alters the common law position - Evidence Act - Scope of admission - Tender of circumstantial evidence for a non hearsay purpose - Admissions with authority.
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Crimes Act
Ahern v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 87 Guimond v R (1979) 44 CCC (2d) 181 R v Baladjam [No 4] 18 March 2008 at [16] R v Baladjam [No 19] 28 May 2008 R v Baladjam [No 28] 24 June 208 at paras 41 and 60 R v Dinh [2000] NSWCCA 536 CASES CITED : R v Horton; R v Esposito 45 NSWLR 442 (1998) A Crim R 306 R v Macraild CCA, unreported, 18 December 1997 - BC 9707215 R v Masters, Richards & Wunderlich (1992) 26 NSWLR R v Khazaal per Latham J 16 July 2008 R v Saleam (No 1) (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 at 18(C) R v Saleam (No 2) (1999) NSWCCA 86 at (11) Williams v Minister for Justice [2007] 239 ALR 689
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate