NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bevilacqua v Robinson [2008] NSWSC 463
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 & 5 May 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 20 May 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Jagot AJ
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY PROVISION - application by de facto partner of deceased - relatively short relationship - de facto partner benefited from deceased's bounty during relationship - other claims on deceased's bounty - de facto partner had not established inadequate provision for his proper maintenance, education and advancement in life.
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Ernst v Mowbray [2004] NSWSC 1140 Gollege v Donnachie [2005] NSWSC 16 Hardiman-Burt v Gordon [2008] NSWSC 395 Hyland v Burbidge [2000] NSWSC 12 Kay v Archbold [2008] NSWSC 254 CASES CITED : Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 Palmer v Dolman; Dolman v Palmer [2005] NSWCA 361 Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v Fraser (1995) 36 NSWLR 24 Samsley v Barnes [1990] NSWCA 161 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J, 17 May 1996)
PLAINTIFF Gaetano Bevilacqua PARTIES : DEFENDANT Samantha Jennifer Robinson - Estate of Jennifer Margaret Robinson
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4058 of 2007
COUNSEL : Mr M K Meek with Ms Despina Laftsidis, plaintiff Ms Louise Goodchild, defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate