NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Qaumi v Director of Public Prosecutions [2008] NSWSC 675
HEARING DATE(S) : 26 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 July 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Fullerton J
DECISION : 1. The amended summons is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the first defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - committal proceedings - appeal from order of magistrate where limited cross-examination of witnesses allowed
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Supreme Court Act 1970
Abdel-Hady v Magistrate Freund & Anor [2007] NSWSC 1247 Acuthan v Coates (1986) 6 NSWLR 472 B v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1046; 135 A Crim R 454 Battur v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2002] NSWSC 1237; 136 A Crim R 533 CASES CITED : Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v O'Conner [2006] NSWSC 458 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 McKirdy v McCosker & Anor [2002] NSWSC 197 Nanevski v Haskett & Anor [2006} NSWSC 1114 Sim v Magistrate Corbett & Anor [2006] NSWSC 665
Farhad Qaumi (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First defendant) Deputy Chief Magistrate Syme (Second defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2007/15692
COUNSEL : D Stewart (Plaintiff) CA Webster (First defendant)
SOLICITORS : Ross Hill & Associates (Plaintiff) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (First defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate