NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: AZZI v REGINA [2008] NSWCCA 169
HEARING DATE(S): Wednesday 21 May 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 July 2008
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Hoeben J at 2; Hall J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – offender convicted of aggravated assault with intent to rob – alleged sentencing judge erred in precluding consideration of an available sentence – sentencing judge had expressed a provisional sentence then revised the sentence upwards – appeal dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Law Enforcement (Power and Responsibilities) Act 2002
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Kutchera v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 121 CASES CITED : Regina v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Regina v Mason [2000] NSWCCA 207 Regina v Tuncbilek [2004] NSWCCA 139
PARTIES: John AZZI v REGINA
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3043
COUNSEL: Crown: N Adams App: A Francis
SOLICITORS: Crown: S Kavanagh App: S O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 07/21/0019
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Armitage DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 15 June 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/3043
JAMES J HOEBEN J HALL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate