NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: The Owners of Strata Plan No 3397 v Tate (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 50
HEARING DATE(S): Application in chambers
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P; McColl JA; Harrison J
DECISION: Motion dismissed
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - motion to vary costs order following correction of arithmetical error in judgment – original costs order confirmed
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED: Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY: Consequential orders
CASES CITED: The Owners of Strata Plan No 3397 v Tate [2007] NSWCA 207
PARTIES: The Owners of Strata Plan No 3397 (Appellant / Cross-Respondent) Warwick Bannister Tate (Cross-Appellant / Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40921 of 2005
COUNSEL: G A Sirtes (Appellant / Cross-Respondent) M D Young (Cross-Appellant / Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Robinson & Davies Pty Ltd (Appellant / Cross-Respondent) Andreones (Cross-Appellant / Respondent)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40921 of 2005
MASON P McCOLL JA HARRISON J
9 April 2008 The Owners of Strata Plan No 3397 v Warwick Bannister Tate (No 2) Judgment THE COURT 1 Judgment in the original appeal to this Court was delivered on 16 August 2007: see [2007] NSWCA 207. The Court made the following orders: (1) Appeal allowed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate